We set back our clocks, adding an extra hour to an already interminable election cycle, suspending for just a few more minutes the climactic process that will end tomorrow. At last, there will be an end to a certain kind of theorizing. Election Day will produce a snapshot of national sentiment. A new political adventure will begin.
The presidential race has generated abundant evidence pointing to the topsy-turvy condition of the country, its leadership and parties. On the PBS NewsHour, Mark Shields noted the strange inversion that’s occurring: whereas ordinary blue-collar Americans used to tip the scale Democratic in national elections, the Democratic Party has become the ‘upscale’ party, while blue-collar America is flocking to Trump. David Brooks noted that the nation was already divided at the outset, but that those divisions have become more calcified in the campaign. He went so far as to say that ‘people are just going with their gene pool,‘ an unfortunate measure of how ‘identity politics’ and a growing reliance on demographic categories (common in the social sciences) are encouraging evenly highly intelligent people to adopt an essentialized and racist view of American voters.
Peggy Noonan, writing in the Wall Street Journal, captured the incipient re-alignment that appears to be happening. She argues eloquently that the people Trump represents are not a ‘wing’ of the Republican Party, but a huge constituency that has broken off from the Republican Party already. The Republican Party was living on borrowed time even before Trump came along, with events of the past fifteen years rupturing the identity of belief that used to unite the party’s base with its leaders. The party will either have to reunite around a new constellation of ideas or end up in pieces. Meanwhile, the Democracy, formerly the party of change, is now the party of cozy continuity. While Sanders’ challenge to Clinton should have been a wake-up call to the party, it’s difficult to imagine its ideology changing much under a Clinton presidency.
Whether Trump wins or not, his candidacy has established that voters who want to stick it to the establishment and ‘the system’ are nearly a national majority. As my husband put it, a ‘Republican revolution’ is happening. Whatever Trump’s personal destiny, his views on trade, immigration, terrorism, and the need to push back against an overreaching government will likely be taken up and refined—in fact, if Politico is to be believed, they already are. Ideologues who have the patience to tune ideas to the times should be listening to the electorate, which is clamoring for a form of small-state protectionism that neither the Republican nor the Democratic party currently affords.
Image: Aerial of Washington DC in November
by Susan Barsy