This map of House election results from the New York Times dramatically conveys the state of democracy on the ground. Because the entire House stands for election every two years, the results express the state of local sentiment better than Senate elections can.
The map does not correct for population density, so one must bear in mind that some of the vast red areas represent relatively few people. Still, it’s sobering to contemplate the restricted appeal of a Democratic ethos. Just think of all the Americans, living in all the varied settings pictured on this map, to whom Democratic party principles no longer appeal. Democratic strength is extremely limited geographically, whereas, as David Brooks points out, it’s hard to deny that Republican conservatism represents the mainstream. It’s ironic, because red regions contain many people who use and benefit from the sorts of programs and services that Democrats perennially champion and defend. Well-being is not all that drives people to the polls.
The Democratic Party’s ethos no longer resonates with such voters culturally. Instead, the party has become identified mainly with the coastal and urban regions where more educated people tend to gather. Looking at this map, it’s easy to understand why ‘mainstream’ Americans resent the undue influence that urban elites exercise through the media.
Many Democrats I know, convinced of the morality and truth of their views, do not see a need to proselytize. I once asked a liberal friend why she didn’t volunteer to canvas in Democratic campaigns, and she said, “I guess it’s because I’m right—and I think that, if other people can’t see that, there’s nothing I can do.” It’s a shame, because the Democratic Party is becoming irrelevant to a huge natural constituency of small-town and working-class Americans who are just getting by. In those broad regions where Democratic leaders are giving up, an important strain of political culture may one day die.
The Enduring Republican Grip on the House (NYT)